In a shocking revelation, renowned journalist Manasseh Azure Awuni questions the integrity of the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) in a recent panel discussion. He boldly declares his belief in lawyer Martin Kpebu's account over the OSP's, citing a history of questionable actions by the OSP.
But why would a respected journalist doubt an institution meant to uphold integrity? Manasseh explains that the OSP's credibility is in question due to its past behavior. He provides a compelling example: the OSP claimed its investigation into the SML scandal commenced in 2023, but Manasseh's sources indicate it began in 2025. This discrepancy casts a shadow on the OSP's reliability.
Here's where it gets controversial: Manasseh reveals his personal experience with the OSP. He recounts how officials contacted him in January 2025, admitting they were about to start the SML investigation and needed his input. This directly contradicts the OSP's public statement about the investigation's timeline. Manasseh's engagement and access to internal OSP documents further support his skepticism.
The journalist also criticizes the OSP for providing inaccurate figures related to the SML scandal, eroding public trust. He argues that believing the OSP's statements has become challenging.
The OSP's actions have sparked intense public backlash, especially after it arrested and detained Kpebu, who was invited to provide information. The OSP accused Kpebu of obstructing justice during an altercation with soldiers, but Kpebu claims he only responded to being called 'stupid' by an officer.
This incident raises important questions: Can we trust the OSP's statements? Are their actions truly aligned with their mandate? And what does this mean for the public's faith in justice?
Comment below: Do you think Manasseh's doubts are justified? Is the OSP's credibility at stake? Share your thoughts and let's discuss this intriguing controversy!
